In an interview
with Sinclair News Dick Armey answers the questions Media Matters didn’t ask. New
Media conservatives didn’t confirm with Dick Armey before printing their hit
pieces. Listen to Dick Armey on Hair on Fire News Talk Radio Glenn Beck was
paid a million dollars to promote Freedom Works…
Red State’s Erick Erickson
and others who according to Armey, never once tried to contact the former
Freedom Works Chairman to ask him for his side of the story.
Reports and comments that
Dick Armey took the money and ran, Armey is adamant that he is not receiving
one penny of money from Freedom Works nor does he want any money from Freedom
Works. Armey says the “consulting contract” Erickson refers to is between
him and Freedom Works Board of Trustee memberDick
Stephensonand has nothing to do with Freedom Works in any way. All this
more Interview posted with permission of LS
News Group.
ABOUT DICK ARMEY
Richard Keith "Dick"
Armey is a former U.S. Representative from
Texas' 26th congressional district (1985–2003) and House
Majority Leader (1995–2003). He was one of the engineers of the
"Republican Revolution" of the 1990s, in
which Republicans were elected to majorities of both houses
of Congress for the first time in four decades. Armey was one of the
chief authors of the Contract with America. Armey is also an author and
former economics professor.
I got that from a reliable source who
made me promise not to reveal his name. But he knows. Honest. Posted bymbecker908(Diary) Red State
Now I’m
sure some would expect me to back up this claim with some of those “fact”
thingys or maybe a link or two. Well, given that I’ve promise anonymity
for my source, not happening. Just Google “Harry Reid pedophile” there
are 1.79 million hits.
I’ve
known this for some time but I was reluctant to go public with the information
because I always back up my writing with facts and links. Since I’m sworn
to secrecy this time I was uncomfortable putting this story out until some
seminal events occurred this week, and I figured “what’s good for the goose…”
As
I’m sure you know, Harry Reid (the pedophile), told a reporter that “somebody”
at the evil Bain Capital told him that Mitt Romney won’t release his taxes
because he didn’t pay any taxes for ten years. And today Harry Reid (the
pedophile) doubled down on this statement in the Las Vegas Review Journal:
On Wednesday, Reid stuck to his story, and broadened it.
“I am not basing this on some figment of my imagination,”
Reid said in a telephone call with Nevada reporters. “I have had a number of
people tell me that.”
Asked to elaborate on his sources, Reid declined. “No,
that’s the best you’re going to get from me.”
“I don’t think the burden should be on me,” Reid said.
“The burden should be on him. He’s the one I’ve alleged has not paid any taxes.
Why didn’t he release histax
returns?”
So,
goose, meet gander.
I’ve
had what I consider to be very credible sources (multiple) tell me Harry Reid
is a pedophile. One even said he’d seen child porn on Harry’s umm office
computer. That’s a pretty specific charge and I think the Capitol Police
should get awarrant.
I’m
expecting this story to be P1 above the fold in theNYTand WaPo in the next few days and
Redstate traffic should get a real bump – you’re welcome Erick.
Feel
free to tell your friends, post on your blogs and drop a letter to the editor
of your local paper. Harry Reid is a pedophile and one hell of a lot
worse, and a bigger story, than Mitt’s taxes.
Obama:
"The economy is not doing fine. There are too many people out of work.
The housing market is still weak and too many homes are underwater." (President
Barack Obama, Remarks,
Washington, D.C., 6/8/12)
Obama:
"The private sector is doing fine."(President Obama, Press
Conference, Washington D.C., 6/8/12)
"The private sector is small businesses. It's middle
class families that run them. It's entrepreneurs and start ups and job creators.
And it's not 'doing
fine.' Incomes are dropping, prices are rising, and the future is becoming
more uncertain...
"This is the danger of a president who has zero
private sector experience. He does not understand what policies are good for the
economy because he does not even recognize what's wrong with the economy...
"We need a president with private sector experience.
If it was not clear before, it is now painfully obvious. Thankfully, Mitt Romney
has excellent private sector experience. Even former President Bill Clinton praises his
'sterling business career'...
"Any voter who wonders whether to vote for Gov.
Romney or for President Obama in November should remember this: President Obama
thinks the 'private sector is doing fine.' If you don't collect a government
paycheck, he thinks you're 'doing fine.' And that means he doesn't think you-or
your neighbors, or your children looking for work-are struggling.Excerpt
Cross Post
Erik Erickson, editor-in-chief of RedState.com and a CNN political
contributor, reports
that he is the latest conservative to be "SWAT"ed.
Local police received a call from an individual claiming to be Erickson,
stating that an accidental shooting had occurred at his home. Says Erickson,
"Tonight, my family was sitting around the kitchen table eating dinner when
sheriffs deputies pulled up in the driveway."
In a statement to Breitbart News, Erickson further explained:
I can say that the Sheriff's Deputy told me someone had called from my
number, giving my home address, claiming an accidental shooting.
Whether or not they actually gave the number, I don't know. My actual guess
is that, given how we have our number set up, someone called 911 from a blocked
number and gave our home address.
This tactic has previously been used on conservative blogger Michael Patrick
Frey aka Patterico, a California Deputy District Attorney, and Mike Stack, a New
Jersey private citizen, both of whom were targeted by the left following the sex
scandal which forced Anthony Weiner to resign from Congress.
Patterico's SWATer told 911 dispatchers that he (posing as the blogger) had
shot his own wife, and police greeted him with
drawn weapons, handcuffing him and waking his wife to frisk her as a police
helicopter flew over their home.
Erickson's tale is far less dramatic than Patterico's, and he explains, "I
had already, last week, advised the Sheriff’s Department to be on the look out
for something like this." This latest SWATing occurred the same weekend as a
coordinated blogging campaign to highlight convicted bomber Brett Kimberlin.
This is a breaking news update. Look to Breitbart News for further
developments.
Monday, January 16, 2012
RELIGION STAY OUT OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS...
Secluded on a ranch in Texas a 150 evangelicalsocial conservatives, activists flex their muscle vote to back Rick Santorum...
A paltry 150 social conservatives by no means have the right to speak for the millions of Judo/Christians that have the right to vote.What political motivation did this self appointed group have to interfere in the political process?
Since a group of self-appointed conservative Christian activist threw their support behind a candidate violating the Constitution that there should be a separation between church and state: A lot has been written about the endorsement over the week end since Tony Perkins made the announce that Rick Santorum had been anointed.
My take is if the church/churches/synagogues want to get involved in the political business of endorsing candidates as organizations they should lose their non-taxable status and the lose the privileges of being called a church. Will the IRS and the Obama start an investigation? Will the DOJ sue the lot of them for interfering in the political process of a presidential election?
According to the Constitution there should be a separation of church and state and they have violated that principle. Will they go back to their respective congregations and tout who to vote for? be ###
This election—including the Republican primary contest— is about a fundamental question in American politics: We have an opportunity to decisively turn away from big government in Washington. Do we want to take it?
Conservatives across the country are fed up with President Obama’s Washington approach to governance. Massive, budget-busting, deficit spending (except on defense, where he proposes cuts that are downright dangerous). Bailouts. An ever-mounting national debt. A federal government that has reached its tentacles further into Americans’ lives, by virtue of Obamacare with its noxious individual mandate to purchase health insurance. Excessive, bureaucratically dictated, job-killing environmental regulation. Dodd-Frank. The actions of the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Communications Commission, and countless other agencies. A President who has engaged in offensive recess appointments to pay back his political allies ahead of a race he could well lose. And so on.
Almost universally, Republicans hold in contempt the real-life “ends” of the Obama administration’s policies, though admittedly there are those self-described conservatives who have favored (and even authored) Obamacare-like approaches to health care and policies like cap-and-trade. To us, those ends look decidedly liberal and reminiscent of European social democracies, and out of step with our vision for America.
Yet some conservatives, while rejecting the “ends” have not yet fully rejected the means, despite the fact that many Americans—and not just conservatives or libertarians— have reached the conclusion that the federal government has just become too big and has its fingers in too many pies, with the predictable negative real-world consequences for the rest of us.
They argue that a big intrusive government is fine, desirable even, so long as it pursues “conservative” goals, which frequently when scrutinized are neither conservative nor worthy. Earmarks are okay, as long as they are directed by “conservatives.” Expansions of government like Medicare Part D and No Child Left Behind were acceptable because they represented “Republican” policy. Congress spending all its time in Washington, DC, and legislating madly is fine, so long as the congressmen are Republicans and they are pursuing something that the Washington, DC, establishment has deemed “conservative.” It’s okay to have a government so big, so unaccountable and playing with so much money that serving Members of Congress can get rich while on the job, and once off the job, they can get even richer by becoming high-powered corporate consultants before skipping over to K Street itself, to try to grow government and spend even more of your money.
To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, we have reached a critical juncture at which government is not the solution to our problems; government is the problem.
Big government conservatives will never truly overhaul Washington because they need the status quo in place to accomplish their objectives. They don’t want to rebuild the machine; they simply want to change the people pulling the levers.
But that is not what the American people want. There is such deep and widespread discontent that nothing short of a complete overhaul will satisfy their justifiable demands.
The American people expect changes equal to their concern, which is the highest it’s been in at least a generation, and I am the only candidate with a vision that is as strong and sweeping as the public is angry.
While others promise to tinker with the status quo, I am the outsider who will overhaul Washington. Others talk about trimming the bureaucracy; I will eliminate the Departments of Commerce, Energy and Education, gut the activist EPA, freeze bureaucrat salaries and make Congress part-time. Others talk about cleaning up the tax code; I say let Americans throw the whole thing out and pay a simple flat tax instead. Others talk about creating jobs; I alone have worked with the private sector to create more than 1 million jobs while the rest of the country lost 2 million jobs.
This is what the 2012 election is about with the Republican primary process ongoing, and it is what the 2012 general election should be about, too.
Do we want to stick with a big government approach that may, if self-described “conservatives” are in power, deliver up conservative ends, even though that same big government will be used by liberals to advance progressivism the second they get their hands on the reins of power?
Or do we want to try something different—making Washington, DC, as inconsequential as possible in our lives and scaling back the federal government to focus on legitimate national priorities like defense and border security, and leaving other matters like education, for example, to the states and localities?
This is the choice that I believe faces us, as more primaries approach and as Republicans select a nominee. Our answer to the question will determine the outcome of the nomination battle, and it will also determine whether this choice is ultimately presented to the American people in November.
I, for one, hope it will be. America cannot abide another four years of big, intrusive government, no matter its philosophical goals. It’s time for a change. That entails Americans getting a choice. Source
Saturday, January 7, 2012
SANTORUM THE BIG GOVERNMENT CANDIDATE…
Who was also voted one of the most corrupt congressman…
Santorum may be more conservative on social issues than Democrats, but when it comes to tax and spend he’s right up there with the liberal Democrats in Congress.
NEA
Voted for taxpayer funding of the National Endowment for the Arts. Voted against a 10% cut in the budget for National Endowment for the Arts.
Bankruptcy Voted for a Schumer amendment to make the debts of pro-life demonstrators not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Defense and Foreign Policy
Voted for the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Voted against requiring the President to certify that the CWC is effectively verifiable.
Voted against requiring the President to certify that that Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, North Korea, China, and all other countries determined to be state sponsors of terror have joined CWC prior to submitting the instrument of ratification.
Voted for the START II Treaty Voted to allow the sale of supercomputers to China. Voted to ban antipersonnel landmines Voted against increasing defense spending offset by equivalent cuts in non-defense spending. Voted to require that Federal bureaucrats get the same payraises as uniformed military. Voted to allow food and medicine sales to state sponsors of terror and tyranical regimes such as Libya and Cuba. Voted to limit the President’s authority to impose sanctions on nations for reasons of national security unless the sanctions were approved by a multilateral regime. Voted against requiring Congressional authorization for military action in Bosnia. Voted to give $25 million in foreign aid to North Korea Voted to weaken alien terrorist deportation provisions. If the Court determines that the evidence must be withheld for national security reasons, the Justice Department must still provide a summary of the evidence sufficient for the alien terrorist to mount a defense against deportation. Voted against delaying the India Nuclear until the President certified that India had agreed to suspend military-to-military exchanges with Iran. Voted against the Conventional Trident Missile Program
Nominations Voted for Richard Paez to the 9th Curcuit (cloture) Voted for Sonia Sotomayor, Circuit Judge Voted for Richard Holbrooke to be Ambassador to the UN Voted for Margaret Morrow to be District Judge Votedtwice for Marsha Berzon to the 9thg Circuit Voted for Mary McLaughlin to be District Judge Voted for Tim Dyk to be District Judge Voted for James Brady to be District Judge
Labor Voted against National Right to Work Act Voted against Real of Davis-Bacon Prevailing union wages Voted for Alexis Herman to be Secretary of Labor Voted for mandatory Federal child care funding Voted for Trade Adjustment Assistance. Voted for Job Corps funding Votedtwice in support of Fedex Unionization Voted against allowing a waiver of Davis-Bacon in emergency situations. Voted for minimum wage increases six times hereherehereherehere and here Voted to require a union representative on an IRS oversight board. Voted to exempt IRS union representative from criminal ethics laws. Voted against creating independent Board of Governors to investigate IRS abuses. Guns
Voted to require pawn shops to do background checks on people who pawn a gun. Votedtwice to make it illegal to sell a gun without a secure storage or safety device Voted for a Federal ban on possession of “assault weapons” by those under 18. Voted for Federal funding for anti-gun education programs in schools. Voted for anti-gun juvenile justice bill.
Reform
Voted for funding for the legal services corporation. Votedtwice for a Congressional payraise. Voted to impose a uniform Federal mandate on states to force them to allow convicted rapits, arsonists, drug kingpins, and all other ex-convicts to vote in Federal elections. Voted for the Specter “backup plan” to allow campaign finance reform to survive if portions of the bill were found unconstitutional. Voted to mandate discounted broadcast times for politicians. Voted for a McCain amendment to require State and local campaign committees to report all campaign contributions to the FEC and to require all campaign contributions to be reported to the FEC within 24 hours within 90 days of an election.
Immigration Voted against increasing the number of immigration investigators Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens Voted to give SSI benefits to legal aliens. Voted to give welfare benefits to naturalized citizens without regard to to the earnings of their sponsors. Voted against hiring an additional 1,000 border partrol agents, paid for by reductions in state grants.
Taxes Voted against a flat tax. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for Medicare prescription drugs Voted to increase tobacco taxes to fund health insurance subsidies for small businesses. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an $8 billion increase in child healh insurance. Voted to increase tobacco taxes to pay for an increase in NIH funding. Votedtwice for internet taxes. Voted to allow gas tax revenues to be used to subsidize Amtrak. Voted to strike marriage penalty tax relief and instead provide fines on tobacco companies. Voted against repealing the Clinton 4.3 cent gas tax increase. Voted to increase taxes by $2.3 billion to pay for an Amtrak trust fund. Voted to allow welfare to a minor who had a child out of wedlock and who resided with an adult who was on welfare within the previous two years. Voted to increase taxes by $9.4 billion to pay for a $9.4 billion increase in student loans. Voted to say that AMT patch is more important than capital gains and dividend relief.
Welfare Voted against food stamp reform Voted against Medicaid reform Voted against TANF reform Voted to increase the Social Services Block Grant from $1 billion to $2 billion Voted to increase the FHA loan from $170,000 to $197,000. Also opposed increasing GNMA guaranty from 6 basis points to 12. Voted for $2 billion for low income heating assistance.
Waste Sponsored An amendment to increase Amtrak funds by $550 million Voted to use HUD funds for the Joslyn Art Museum (NE), the Stand Up for Animals project (RI) and the Seattle Art Museum’s Olympic Sculpture Project (WA) Voted to increase spending on social programs by $7 billion Voted to increase NIH funding by $1.6 billion. Voted to increase NIHnding by $700 million Voted to for a $2 million earmark to renovate the Vulcan Monument (AL) Voted for a $1 billion bailout for the steel industry Voted against requiring that highway earmarks would come out of a state’s highway allocation Voted to allow Market Access Program funds to go to foreign companies. Voted to allow OPIC to increase its administrative costs by 50% Voted against transferring $20 million from Americorps to veterans. Voted for the $140 billion asbestos compensation bill. Voted against requiring a uniform medical criteria to ensure asbestos claims were legitimate. Voted to increase community development programs by $2 billion.
Spending and Entitlements Voted to make Medicare part B premium subsidies an new entitlement. Voted against paying off the debt ($5.6 trillion at the time) within 30 years. Voted to give $18 billion to the IMF. Voted to raid Social Security instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.
Health Care Voted to allow states to impose health care mandates that are stricter than proposed new Federal mandates, but not weaker. Votedtwice for Federal mental health parity mandates in health insurance. Voted against a allow consumers the option to purchase a plan outside the parity mandate.
Education Voted to increase Federal funding for teacher testing Voted to increase spending for the Department of Education by $3.1 billion. Voted against requiring courts to consider the impact of IDEA awards on a local school district.
Energy
Voted to allow the President to designate certain sites as interim nuclear waste storage sites in the event that he determines that Yucca Mountain is not a suitable site for a permanent waste repository. Those sites are as follows: the nuclear waste site in Hanford, Washington; the Savannah River Site in South Carolina; Barnwell County, South Carolina; and the Oak Ridge Reservation in Tennessee.
Our forefathers pledged their lives, their fortunes and their scared honor to give us a Republic with Liberty and Freedom and Benjamin Franklin upon leaving the signing of the Constitution said "we have given you a Republic, if you can keep it." Can we keep it? Are we going to stand by and let the government we elected take away our Freedom and Liberties? FREEDOM MUST BE DEFENDED, NOW IS THE TIME and WE ARE THAT GENERATION!!! Semper Fi