RELIGION STAY OUT OF THE POLITICAL PROCESS...
Secluded on a ranch in Texas a 150 evangelical social conservatives, activists flex their muscle vote to back Rick Santorum...
A paltry 150 social conservatives by no means have the right to speak for the millions of Judo/Christians that have the right to vote. What political motivation did this self appointed group have to interfere in the political process?
Since a group of self-appointed conservative Christian activist threw their support behind a candidate violating the Constitution that there should be a separation between church and state: A lot has been written about the endorsement over the week end since Tony Perkins made the announce that Rick Santorum had been anointed.
My take is if the church/churches/synagogues want to get involved in the political business of endorsing candidates as organizations they should lose their non-taxable status and the lose the privileges of being called a church. Will the IRS and the Obama start an investigation? Will the DOJ sue the lot of them for interfering in the political process of a presidential election?
According to the Constitution there should be a separation of church and state and they have violated that principle. Will they go back to their respective congregations and tout who to vote for? be ###
Related: The Evangelical Vote
