WHEN IT'S OKAY TO SHOOT A COP..

This is a video that needs to be watched by every American!!! Looking for something 

controversial to watch today, try this on for size:If blunt truth makes you uncomfortable, maybe you need to be uncomfortable. He is correct. The title I’m sure was of thought of to attract attention..

The point he is making in this video is laws are made for us to live by not to control our lives.BE

I agree 100% ...people need to understand that our Government is only a vehicle to pass laws that

 "we the people" agree to live by, not the other way around. wbatswinm

EXCERPT FROM ARTICLE:

That question, even without an answer, makes most “law-abiding taxpayers” go into knee-jerk conniptions. The indoctrinated masses all race to see who can be first, and loudest, to proclaim that it is NEVER okay to forcibly resist “law enforcement.” In doing so, they also inadvertently demonstrate why so much of human history has been plagued by tyranny and oppression.
In an ideal world, cops would do nothing except protect people from thieves and attackers, in which case shooting a cop would never be justified. In the real world, however, far more injustice, violence, torture, theft, and outright murder has been committed IN THE NAME of “law enforcement,” than has been committed in spite of it. To get a little perspective, try watching a documentary or two about some of the atrocities committed by the regimes of Stalin, or Lenin, or Chairman Mao, or Hitler, or Pol Pot, or any number of other tyrants in history. Pause the film when the jackboots are about to herd innocent people into cattle cars, or gun them down as they stand on the edge of a ditch, and THEN ask yourself the question, “When should you shoot a cop?” Keep in mind, the evils of those regimes were committed in the name of “law enforcement.” And as much as the statement may make people cringe, the history of the human race would have been a lot LESS gruesome if there had been a lot MORE “cop-killers” around to deal with the state mercenaries of those regimes.



VIEW VIDEO
COMMENTS:

• Larken, I think you got the title of the article wrong. It should be: "When Should You Kill, Injure Or Detain A Cop"

  You assume that I have a gun when the cop's assaulting me. What if I have a knife or nothing at all, but my hands or my knife are quicker than the cop's gun? What if by using my fighting skills I can kill or detain the cop without having to use a gun? Shouldn't I do it just because is not gun vs gun fight?

  SopraTutt1 
• @SopraTutt1 Of course, you're right, but I doubt such an awkward (though more accurate) title would have gotten people's attention as well. To double-nitpick, the topic of the article, contrary to the title, isn't even when you SHOULD; the question is when it would be morally justifiable, even if a bad idea in practical terms. But I didn't really want to title it, "In What Situations Would It Be Morally Justifiable (Even If Hazardous) To Use Whatever Means of Forcible Defense Available..."

  LarkenRose 
• Larken,

  Government thugs extort your wealth via a property tax.  Why would you not resist this theft yet will resist a thief entering your home? Are you resisting the property tax theft at all?

  Beesnchickens
• @Beesnchickens I'm assuming you know the answer. I don't resist thieves who outgun me. If fifty armed, private thugs tried to steal my stuff, they would probably succeed. Resistance for the sake of martyrdom is not useful. However, I'm happy to say that, since the bank will be stealing my house eventually anyway, I stopped paying the local pirates for the privilege of living there.

  LarkenRose