Having
been involved in the passage of Right-To-Work legislation in Indiana and
Michigan, I can attest to the tireless efforts of these grassroots movements –
by local businesses in Indiana and concerned United Auto Worker employees in
Michigan – to achieve the goal of protecting worker freedoms. Statistical data
shows that the implementation of a Right-To-Work law is positive, as such states
see statistical growth in both population and jobs. Some have suggested that a
Right-To-Work law’s importance is in the guarantee of the freedom of choice and
the assurance of a lack of intimidation in the organizing process, but it
appears this may not be accurate.
A
recent article by Diana Furchtgott-Roth of The Manhattan Institute, suggests
not. Ms. Furchtgott-Roth points out that RTW states not only have the highest
employment growth over the last 4-5 years, but they also have the highest growth
rate for union membership! The statistics she presented were absolutely
astonishing, but few people have picked up on the significance and logic behind
the union growth in these states. The truly frightening part is the number of
cases recorded, since Card Check is virtually unregulated and therefore
untraceable.
“Why
Union Growth: According to data from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB),
in 38% of all union recognitions in 2009, the latest year for which data is
available, unions bypassed secret ballot elections and instead used card checks
to unionize employees. Specifically, the NLRB reports that unions won 794
single-union representation elections. During that period, the NLRB recorded 485
notices of card check union recognition.”
Unfortunately,
Big Labor’s “Gasping
Dinosaurs” are a resourceful lot. Their political contributions have bought
them the support of President Obama and his Administration, who has, in turn,
appointed a Rogue
NLRB. The NLRB is currently lead by heavily pro-union favored board
members, many of whom were unconstitutionally appointed by the President (see Appeals Court Nixed Obama's Recess
Appointments). The result of this support is that Big Labor bosses see
RTW states as a shining new opportunity to rebuild its declining membership.
The Gasping
Dinosaurs understand that with the support of the indebted President and
pro-labor support from the NLRB, they can achieve membership without an election
through Card Check by utilizing their insidious campaigns of “Death
by a Thousand Cuts.”
Once
they have infiltrated the masses, Big Labor can then use the same type tactics
against the newly forced unionized employees to ensure that they don’t exercise
their right not to pay dues (or in some cases, belong to the union) under RTW
laws. This can be accomplished by making sure that the uneducated are not
advised of these rights, or by the specific targeting of persons who choose not
to pay dues. This can be accomplished because, unions are legally allowed to
broadcast a list of those individuals who choose not to pay dues (see Worker’s
Allege Improper Collection of Union Dues).
This
raises concern, as it is unclear how the “dues-paying” union membership will
choose to use this list. Membership who view non-payers as “freeloaders,” may be
inclined to use unlawful
force, threats, and/or intimidation in an attempt to alter a
non-member’s decision. Unfortunately, most members ultimately cave, as employees
subject to such intimidation have few options. While this type of activity is
unlawful, the sole oversight of these actions belongs with the National Labor
Relations Board, a partisan governmental “agency” whose devotion to labor unions
is well-documented and unquestioned. The process is timely, difficult to
understand, and expensive - as it generally includes the involvement of an
attorney to represent ones interest. With little oversight, Big Labor can
continue to grow its membership in RTW states through a combination of employee
and employer intimidation, with no government regulation to hinder its
actions.
Although
RTW has been a Godsend for many states, employees and employers, RTW laws need
more “teeth” in order to truly protect employees and employers from ruthless
forced unionization tactics. The following changes would eliminate the “behind
the scenes” intimidation and allow for fair representation in union elections.
Additionally, these changes would impose collective bargaining restrictions that
would allow members to make decisions free of coercion as to whether they wished
to remain part of the bargaining unit.
a) Replace
the current union monopoly representation with a secret ballot election every
three years, so unions have to justify their actions to the employees. Unions
must obtain written consent from every dues paying member before using money on
anything other than collective bargaining activities.
b)
Institute a new regulation that outlaws neutrality-type agreements, which allow
card check in lieu of secret ballot elections.
Leveling
the Playing Field through these changes and passing a National
Right-To-Work Law are necessary steps to improve the economy and
continue to create jobs absent the threat of Big Labor intimidation! It is
imperative for this great country and the freedom of its citizens that new
“teeth” are introduced to support and assure the success of the recently passed
Right-To-Work laws.
|