Putting “Teeth”
in Right-To-Work
|
Having
been involved in the passage of Right-To-Work legislation in Indiana and
Michigan, I can attest to the tireless efforts of these grassroots movements –
by local businesses in Indiana and concerned United Auto Worker employees in
Michigan – to achieve the goal of protecting worker freedoms. Statistical data
shows that the implementation of a Right-To-Work law is positive, as such states
see statistical growth in both population and jobs. Some have suggested that a
Right-To-Work law’s importance is in the guarantee of the freedom of choice and
the assurance of a lack of intimidation in the organizing process, but it
appears this may not be accurate.
A
recent article by Dianna Furchtgott-Roth of The Manhattan Institute, suggests
not. Ms. Furchtgott-Roth points out that RTW states not only have the highest
employment growth over the last 4-5 years, but they also have the highest growth
rate for union membership! The statistics she presented were absolutely
astonishing, but few people have picked up on the significance and logic behind
the union growth in these states. The truly frightening part is the number of
cases recorded, since Card Check is virtually unregulated and therefore
untraceable.
“Why
Union Growth: According to data from the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB),
in 38% of all union recognitions in 2009, the latest year for which data is
available, unions bypassed secret ballot elections and instead used card checks
to unionize employees. Specifically, the NLRB reports that unions won 794
single-union representation elections. During that period, the NLRB recorded 485
notices of card check union recognition.”
Unfortunately,
Big Labor’s “Gasping Dinosaurs” are a resourceful lot.
Their political contributions have bought them the support of President Obama
and his Administration, who has, in turn, appointed a Rogue NLRB. The NLRB is currently lead
by heavily pro-union favored board members, many of whom were unconstitutionally
appointed by the President (see Appeals Court Nixed Obama's Recess
Appointments). The result of this support is that Big Labor
bosses see RTW states as a shining new opportunity to rebuild its declining
membership. The Gasping Dinosaurs understand that with the
support of the indebted President and pro-labor support from the NLRB, they can
achieve membership without an election through Card Check by utilizing
their insidious campaigns of “Death by a
Thousand Cuts.”
Once
they have infiltrated the masses, Big Labor can then use the same type tactics
against the newly forced unionized employees to ensure that they don’t exercise
their right not to pay dues (or in some cases, belong to the union) under RTW
laws. This can be accomplished by making sure that the uneducated are not
advised of these rights, or by the specific targeting of persons who choose not
to pay dues. This can be accomplished because, unions are legally allowed to
broadcast a list of those individuals who choose not to pay dues (see Worker’s Allege Improper Collection of Union
Dues).
This
raises concern, as it is unclear how the “dues-paying” union membership will
choose to use this list. Membership who view non-payers as “freeloaders,” may be
inclined to use unlawful force, threats, and/or
intimidation in an attempt to alter a non-member’s decision.
Unfortunately, most members ultimately cave, as employees subject to such
intimidation have few options. While this type of activity is unlawful, the
sole oversight of these actions belongs with the National Labor Relations Board,
a partisan governmental “agency” whose devotion to labor unions is
well-documented and unquestioned. The process is timely, difficult to
understand, and expensive - as it generally includes the involvement of an
attorney to represent ones interest. With little oversight, Big Labor can
continue to grow its membership in RTW states through a combination of employee
and employer intimidation, with no government regulation to hinder its
actions.
Although
RTW has been a Godsend for many states, employees and employers, RTW laws need
more “teeth” in order to truly protect employees and employers from ruthless
forced unionization tactics. The following changes would eliminate the “behind
the scenes” intimidation and allow for fair representation in union elections.
Additionally, these changes would impose collective bargaining restrictions that
would allow members to make decisions free of coercion as to whether they wished
to remain part of the bargaining unit.
1.
Reinstate
Secret Ballot Elections:
Uphold the long standing belief in allowing people to vote their conscience
through a “Secret Ballot Election” by inserting language that requires all
union representation be achieved by secret ballot conducted under the auspices
of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Currently Indiana State Senator
Jim Banks has introduced such an Amendment to the Indiana state
constitution and Virginia has already passed such a law (see New Employee
Privacy and Union Voting Rights Laws in Virginia Go Into Effect July 2013).
·
Eliminate
Check Off Clauses:
Such clauses in collective bargaining agreements require unionized employers and
government entities to deduct union dues from members paychecks and forward them
to the union. These clauses are utilized by Big Labor through intimidation to
force employees to remain part of the bargaining unit in RTW states. Unions
should be required to be their own accountants and collect dues directly from
the employees without third party involvement. In essence members would then
have the ability to decide, just like in the free market, if the
services/products they are receiving are worth paying for directly. This is no
different than a person paying when satisfied for legal, real estate, investing,
or other services/ products. It only makes sense, but is often a non-starter for
Big Labor in contract negotiations (see Teachers Silenced by Teachers Union).
·
Eliminate
Monopoly Representation and Outlaw Neutrality Agreements:
In The Devil at Our Doorstep, I presented
the following as the first two points in my "Ten-Point Plan to Battle Big
Labor."
a) Replace
the current union monopoly representation with a secret ballot election every
three years, so unions have to justify their actions to the employees. Unions
must obtain written consent from every dues paying member before using money on
anything other than collective bargaining activities.
b)
Institute a new regulation that outlaws neutrality-type agreements, which allow
card check in lieu of secret ballot elections.
·
Rewrite
Sate Extortion and Blackmail Laws:
James Sherk of The Heritage Foundation accurately proposed that we should modify
state extortion and blackmail laws to include unions, which are currently not
implicated under labor law. This would prohibit pressure campaigns which are
designed to force an employer to surrender, rather than trying to persuade the
employees to unionize.
Leveling the Playing Field
through these changes and passing a National Right-To-Work Law are
necessary steps to improve the economy and continue to create jobs absent the
threat of Big Labor intimidation! It is imperative for this great country and
the freedom of its citizens that new “teeth” are introduced to support and
assure the success of the recently passed Right-To-Work laws.