WHAT A DEAL !
“But with respect to future debt; would it not be wise and just for that nation to declare in the constitution they are forming that neither the legislature, nor the nation itself can validly contract more debt, than they may pay within their own age, or within the term of 19 years.”
“But with respect to future debt; would it not be wise and just for that nation to declare in the constitution they are forming that neither the legislature, nor the nation itself can validly contract more debt, than they may pay within their own age, or within the term of 19 years.”
–Thomas
Jefferson, 1789
The "deal" on raising the
debt limit agreed to by Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), and President
Barack Obama over the weekend is Washington politics to screw America without
any kisses or foreplay: Cut $2 trillion from federal spending over a decade in return for adding $2.4
trillion to the current $14.3 trillion debt this year. Why does compromise in Washington mean spend more
now and cut spending down the road? Because they are spending YOUR money...Why?
Is it a good "deal to raise the debt ceiling now, and cut spending over 10
years.. It's not. It's a deal cut under pressure so Obama can attend his
birthday parties with taxpayers footing the bill.. It's so Obama won't have to
look like the spending buffoon he is until after the 2012 elections. It's to
keep Obama from sinking under the weight of his Marxist agenda to spend America
into poverty. Default let Obama recognized for what he is, "An empty suit
with no experience in economics with a teleprompter.. What a deal! be ###
· We're not the only ones who aren't happy, either. The New
York Times editorialized against the "hostage-taking demands of Republican
extremists," and Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver (D-MO) called it a
"sugar-coated Satan sandwich." If they feel that way about cuts in
growth rates over 10 years, just imagine what they would say if spending were
actually cut. Fortunately, the deal includes no tax hikes, and that's a Tea
Party victory that will help the economy.
All
things considered, this deal is just about as good as we could hope for without
controlling the Senate or the White House, and it's a launching pad for gaining
just that in next year's election. The Patriot Post
· Government
"House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) told GOP members
on a conference call Sunday evening that he had reached a deal with
congressional leaders and the White House, but that it wouldn't happen 'unless
we have membership on board.' It remains to be seen how many House Republicans
will end up supporting the final package, but members on the call told National
Review Online they thought it would ultimately pass with bipartisan support.
... Members described the tone of the call as overwhelmingly positive, with
many praising Boehner's efforts in the negotiations. ... According to sources,
Boehner said the deal was 'the best that we could get.' In particular, he
thanked the 87 freshman members for their input, without which 'we wouldn't
have gotten this far.' ... Freshman Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R., Ind.) told NRO
that with 'the most liberal president we've ever had' occupying the White
House, the Tea Party and the conservative movement have done all right for
themselves. 'I think the Tea Party needs to take credit for changing the dialogue
in Washington to be about cutting spending,' he said. 'But whether I vote for
this plan or not, it's not enough. This isn't the end of the fight.' ...
Boehner told members he would like to vote on the plan as early as Monday
night, and apologized for the short notice. Leaders will meet with the entire
conference Monday to further discuss the details of the plan." --National
Review's Andrew Stiles
